Believers look enviably back on those days when Protestantism predominated; or even farther back to colonial days in New England when Puritanism ruled and followers of other faiths, such as Baptists, Quakers, Catholics, and Jews, were banned from the colony or brutally persecuted.
Children can pray any time, silently and voluntarily as the Bible recommends (Matt.
Jefferson said that instead of putting the Bible and Testament into the hands of children at an age when their judgments are not sufficiently matured for religious inquiries, their memories may here be stored with the most useful facts from Grecian, Roman, European and American history.
Furthermore, those appointed to oversee these schools should not be ministers of the gospel of any denomination.
The thesis statement is, “In the contemporary world of loss of morality, degrading of the school’s system, and lack of strong educational and moral principles among students, it is crucial to initiate prayer in public schools in order to form basis for pupils’ successful spirituality development”. By taking this right away the government violates the children’s rights. The Bible specifically instructs that children have the right to pray whenever and wherever they wish (Matt. United States calls itself a country that respects God, thus the words of God should be at least adhered to B. What these ruling presented was that, to uphold the First Amendment’s claims, no official or unofficial sponsorship was to be connected with the prayer in any school in America. All US judicial system is based on the precedent B.
The twofold politics of allowing prayer in some places and prohibiting it in others can’t be justified c. If the past experience reveals that prayer was allowed in schools, why prohibit it now? The government is likely to benefit from the prayer in public schools A.These were religious exercises and thus constituted an establishment of religion, which violated the rights of children who came from families with different or no religious beliefs.Furthermore, Justice Tom Clark stated clearly in Abington v.The Justices established three criteria to evaluate the legality of an activity in such places as public schools: • it must be secular in nature • it must neither advance nor prohibit religion • there must be no "excessive entanglement" of government and religion In the Engel v.Vitale case, the Supreme Court found unconstitutional the New York Regents "nondenominational" prayer that was recommended to be said each morning in every public school in the state. Schempp, Bible reading as a morning exercise was also ruled a violation of the First Amendment's clause forbidding the establishment of a religion.The counterargument is provided in order to illustrate the opposite vies on the subject.The paper provides opposite views to having prayer in public schools because it is essential to discuss two sides of the argument to make the topic clear and understandable. Religion and government (this section offers an overview of the relationships between the state and religion from the historical and contemporary points of view) 5.However, as the schools grew, they became decidedly Christian and Protestant.Until the 19 Supreme Court decisions, morning worship typically began with teacher or student-led prayer and Bible reading."Public education in America..destroying democracy in America," claimed Pat Robertson (The New World Order 216).This scholar argues that public schools are in the "stranglehold" of the National Education Association, which "is not interested in education, but in power and money" (Robertson, The turning tide 226).