The rubrics illustrate how relevant traits can be described and assessed at four levels of faculty expectations for student performance.
As such, the examples can help faculty develop their own rubrics aligned with their programmatic PLO statements and the signature assignments they have selected as a basis of PLO assessment.
Critical Thinking Holistic Rubric A rubric developed by Dr. Noreen Facione of Insight Assessment, home of the California Critical Thinking Skills Test and California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory.
Washington State University Integrative and Critical Thinking Rubric A rubric template assessing multiple dimensions of critical thinking and effective communication which has been adapted for use in a wide array of disciplines, and which is being used as an instructional tool in courses with measurable impact on improved student learning at Washington State University CALL critical thinking rubric A rubric developed by a group of St.
In the late 1980's a subcommittee of the the American Philosophical Association assembled 46 experts to reach consensus on a definition of critical thinking and how to assess it.
The result is the Delphi Report (Facione, 1990); the Executive Summary is available online.Students cannot become skilled in critical thinking without learning (first) the concepts and principles that underlie critical thinking and (second) applying them in a variety of forms of thinking: historical thinking, sociological thinking, biological thinking, etc.Students cannot become skilled in analyzing and assessing reasoning without practice in it.However, when they have routine practice in paraphrasing, summarizing, analyzing, and assessing, they will develop skills of mind requisite to the art of thinking well within any subject or discipline, not to mention thinking well within the various domains of human life.This is a collection of rubrics found on the internet during our research. The internet address where the rubric was found is at the top of each document. Professors who teach thinking skills such as arguing, analyzing, synthesizing, drawing conclusions, solving problems, making decisions, and evaluating need to know how well their students can use these skills.Overview Rubrics can be used for evaluating essays, research reports, senior theses, works of art, oral presentations, video clips, collaborative work, recitals, dissertations, QE, etc.Below are some examples of nationally-developed analytic rubrics to evaluate key skills of importance at UC Santa Cruz such as PLOs for written and oral communication, critical thinking skills, information literacy, and quantitative reasoning.Unless multiple choice questions are designed very well and ask about a novel situation, multiple choice tests are not good indicators of critical thinking because they ask for recall of thinking described in the lectures or textbook.More information and advice about assessing courses at PGCC can be found in the Course Assessment Handbook.