The consequence of these inaccuracies leads this reviewer to wonder what else is wrong and to question if the information can be trusted in areas where the reviewer has little or no knowledge.
The consequence of these inaccuracies leads this reviewer to wonder what else is wrong and to question if the information can be trusted in areas where the reviewer has little or no knowledge.It is not a book that could be given to students knowing that they would be accurately informed. Profitability, Diversity, and Disability in Advertising in the UK and United States.There is no content analysis conducted and no quantification. There are very interesting examples of which lessons can be learned, but the book does not offer an academic substance.
And yet when someone learns today that she will have a disability or a condition understood as disabling, when a parent-to-be learns that his child will have a physical or cognitive impairment, when television reports that a public figure has become disabled, certain specters are likely to arise -- emotionally freighted, irrational, even mutually contradictory -- of what the life of a person with a disability must be like.
STEREOTYPES AND CONSTRUCTIONS: Until recently, attitudes toward individuals and groups, embodied in popular culture images, would have been called stereotypes.
A few of the discrepancies found: -- Cheryl Marie Wade is identified with having multiple sclerosis (page 52) — she has rheumatoid arthritis. Wade talked of her diagnosis, which is available on the Web at the Online Archive at University of California-Berkeley library (2004).
-- Riley acknowledges that he was not around for "landmark events in disability history as the 'Berkeley quads'" (p. He was referring to Ed Roberts and other UCB students in the 1960s who worked together to improve conditions for people with disabilities on campus.
-- On page 199, he parallels the era to the stereotypes of "craziness" and mental illness: "..vast space of our Web 'laboratory,' which had become one of thousands of such asylums across the United States devoted to the crazed scam that, we now realize, vacuumed up billions of dollars from legitimate enterprises. It is baffling that Riley, who poured so much of his intellect, passion, and commitment into a magazine that hired, trained, and paid people with disabilities, and who in his book refers to using accurate language and staying away from using euphemistic disability language, would in this same book choose language that reinforces stereotypes of people with disabilities. Riley seems to have a love of language and is often playful and deliberate with his word choice, which leads me to think perhaps he has missed the larger issues when focused upon the process of creating.
Disability In The Media Essay
The valuable Chapter 7 on , coupled with the ethical considerations of the separation between advertising and reporting "sides" referenced throughout the book, is of use for media ethics courses. A tell-all book of what happened during this extraordinary time would be interesting and worthy in and of itself. Riley states in the preface that "I did not want to steer this study into the swift current of disability discourse as it mainly exists in the academy since I hope to stay close to my subject — the media's depiction of disability — in the hope that many of my readers will be members of the press themselves" (p. With the exception of issues regarding physician-assisted suicide, I cannot imagine members of the press completing the book and gleaning lessons on how to produce accurate representations of disability.But Riley mixes his tell-all with shallow pseudo-academic references trying to cast a wide net across all media, while name dropping and writing with judgmental — sometimes bitter -- adjectives that detract from a larger thesis of how disability is represented across media, and almost ignoring the "prescriptions for change." So, for whom is the book is written? The book jumps between a "tell-all" about the boom/bust and mostly shallow analysis of how disability is reported on, used in advertising, and represented in popular TV/film.He brings attention to some ethical and debated issues from different points of view like physician-assisted suicide and Christopher Reeve's wanting to walk. Riley's writing flips between the general analysis and his personal experience in a way that leaves the reader feeling there are two books going on inside the one, and they are not well-integrated.The reader is left with the impression that Riley really wanted to write about his perspective on the downfall of .Popular culture images both reflect and affect attitudes.Representations of disability will often reflect contemporaneous ideas in medicine, science, religion, or social management, but those ideas may themselves be affected by the assumptions inherent in popular images and fictional narratives.This truly is a shame, as Riley is comprehensive in accounting for many of the people who were forging new ground in the field of disability and media; it's just some of the facts got jumbled. is published by The Ohio State University Libraries in partnership with the Society for Disability Studies.Surprisingly, throughout the book, Riley chooses to use disability language as metaphor. If you encounter problems with the site or have comments to offer, including any access difficulty due to incompatibility with adaptive technology, please contact [email protected] citations in the Notes section were brought to my attention, too.For example: -- On page 233, note 1 under Chapter 1, Beth Haller is cited as the author from the "Negative Media Portrayals of the ADA" quote used on page 7-8. -- On page 234, note 7, the citation states that Beth Haller and Sue Ralph's "Profitability, Diversity and Disability images in advertising in the United States and Great Britain" was published in .