Therefore, you must select a title that grabs attention, accurately describes the contents of your manuscript, and makes people want to read further.Tags: Collected Essays Of Ralph EllisonClash Of Civilizations Essay SummaryRomanticism Vs Enlightenment EssayExample Of Good Argumentative EssayEssay Of Leadership QualitiesBusiness Plan Templates For MacProblem Solving In Chemical Engineering With Numerical MethodsThesis Binding Sydney UniversityPlessy V Ferguson Essay
The winners will be awarded with the following prize money and an e-certificate 1st place: USD 300 2nd place: USD 200 3rd place: USD 100 WIE Best Paper Award: USD 200 If the first or second prizewinner is a female student then in that case the WIE prize will be given to the runner-up in the WIE category.
However, a female student can win both third and WIE prizes provided the total value of combined prizes is not more than the first prize.
Your Abstract should answer these questions about your manuscript: Answering these questions lets readers know the most important points about your study, and helps them decide whether they want to read the rest of the paper.
Make sure you follow the proper journal manuscript formatting guidelines when preparing your abstract.
• The contest is open only to IEEE Student Members in Region 10.
The papers may be on any engineering subject in the field of interest of IEEE (within the scope of IEEE transactions).
A title that is too long will seem clumsy, annoy readers, and probably not meet journal requirements. It is short, easy to understand, and conveys the important aspects of the research.
Think about why your research will be of interest to other scientists.
which are subordinate to the main argument in the body of the paper, should be given in the appendices, with reference in the main text.
Additional Documents Required • Endorsement letter from Section Chair OR Section Student Activities Chair OR Student Branch Counselor OR Head of the Department/School • Signed copy of the declaration Assessment Criteria Written presentation (worth 40%) with following scoring criteria: Concise, informative abstract Flow of ideas, integration of literature to support purpose, approach and findings Adequacy of the conclusion Compliance with paper format guidelines (IEEE Format) Clarity and direction in exposition Grammar, spelling, style, and choice of words Subject matter (worth 60%) with following scoring criteria: Originality of ideas, experimental procedures, processes, results or conclusions due mainly to the main author Originality analysis, interpretation, and restatement of inference based upon work of contributing authors Quality of technical content Factual and technical accuracy Prizes A total of FOUR WINNERS will be chosen.