Tags: Classroom Management Research PaperMake Good Outline Research Paper123 Help Me EssaysMethod Of Problem SolvingWriting A Essay Answering QuestionsContent Of Research PaperEssays By Kurt VonnegutUnit 1 CourseworkGre Essay Writing
His heart fed upon them, as if they existed only to meet his desires. Finally, the fact that the traveller can glean so much information about the ancient king's power merely from a fallen statue drives home the immensity of his authority. which yet survive" are only "stamped on these lifeless things," yet they still come down through the ages, proclaiming how ruthlessly and unopposed the great king reigned in his day.Although no one could stand up to him while he lived, he succumbed to the rule of time, and now only the broken statue attests to the power he once wielded over his victims.
The story quietly satirizes the so-called great ruler as nothing great in front of the "level sands" of time.
The poem develops only logically as the writer turns and twists the narration, satirizing the tyrant, specifically, and also suggesting the general theme of the vanity of power and pride.
The choice of words has played almost all the tricks discussed above.
The traveler being from an "antique" or the ancient land suggests that the empire was an old one.
The expressiveness of the carving gives further indication of the subject's character.
Reference to the "shattered visage" tells us that the face of the statue was badly broken.The way the traveler has described the shattered statue and the surrounding must be discussed in some detail in order to unravel some of the major thematic ideas in the poem.Near the trunkless pair of legs, there was a broken face with a frown on it.The king was able to deliver his orders without relying on the goodwill his people felt for him.He regarded them with contempt; he treated them without warmth.The first thing to understand is how completely the desert sands are able to engulf and hide something like broken pieces of a statue.The ruins of the statue of Ozymandias must have been huge for them to remain uncovered, as is confirmed when the poem refers to "two vast and trunkless legs." The mere size of the original statue, therefore, is a first clue to the might and power of the person portrayed.The traveler had described a broken statue of an ancient tyrant to this speaker.The present speaker retells us the story in the exact words of the original reporter: the whole poem is in the form of a single stretch of direct speech.Yet he feared no rebellion from his cruelty because of his...Yet he feared no rebellion from his cruelty because of his great power.